You can’t believe Tony Fiorino’s tesimony, the defence argues, since he concedes that he has a “personal stake” in the conviction of Drabinsky and Gottlieb. A guilty verdict would be a step towards the “vindication of his personal reputation,” the defence says.
0
St. Joseph Communications uses cookies for personalization, to customize its online advertisements, and for other purposes. Learn more or change your cookie preferences. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies.
We use cookies (why?) You can change cookie preferences. Continued site use signifies consent.
Blogs & Comment
Drabinsky Final Argument - 25: Tony Fiorino's Personal Stake
By CB Staff
You can’t believe Tony Fiorino’s tesimony, the defence argues, since he concedes that he has a “personal stake” in the conviction of Drabinsky and Gottlieb. A guilty verdict would be a step towards the “vindication of his personal reputation,” the defence says.